Postmodernist Identity Construction and Consumption

Reyhan KARABABA

Abstract


Abstract. With the transition from modernism to postmodernism, identity as a concept has started to become redefined in sociology literature. The aim of this study is to show that postmodernism and symbolic interactionism are fused together to delineate both the scene as well as an actor’s identity. In that way, the interaction of a social structure with a culture that won’t be completely ignored, and, with the opinion that the categorized roles can skillfully be shaped and diversified by actors, it is possible to refrain from a pure determinism. But the transformation to enter different roles lacks meaning. Individuals pay more attention to their appearance more than who they are in order to be accepted by each group. In this manner, a metaphysical shell game begins. In the following study, the “Social Appearance Anxiety” was used as an indicator of this game.  And to determine who is willing to play the game, cultural parameters were utilized.

      This study was based on the analysis of the data collected through two questionnaires given to 181 students studying at Hitit University. The INDCOL questionnaire [Singelis et al., 1995] measuring cultural values and “Social Appearance Anxiety” scale developed by [Hart, 2008] were used in the study. 

 


Keywords


Post Modernism, Identity, Cultural Values, Social Appearance Anxiety, Consumption.

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


T. M. Singelis, H. C. Triandis, D. S. Bhawuk, and M. J. Gelfand. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research. 1995, 29 (3), pp. 240-275.

T. A. Hart, D. B. Flora, S. A. Palyo, D. M. Fresco, C. Holle & R. C. Heimberg. Development and Examination of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale. Assessment. 2008, 15, p. 48-59.

P. L. Callero. The Sociology of the Self. Annual Review of Sociology. 2003, 29, p.115–33.

M. Rosenberg. Self-Concept Research: A Historical Overview. Social Forces. Sept. 1989, 68(1):34-44.

J.B. Watson. Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review. 1913, 20(2), p.158.

D. Snygg. The need for a phenomenological system of psychology. Psychological Review. 1941, 48(5), p.404.

Y. Kashima, A.K. Gurumurthy, L. Ouschan, T. Chong and J. Mattingley. Connectionism and self: James, Mead, and the stream of enculturated consciousness. Psychological Inquiry. 2007, 18(2), pp.73-96.

G. Burrell and G. Morgan. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. 1979, (Vol. 248). london: Heinemann.

S. Stryker. From Mead To A Structural Symbolic İnteractionism and Beyond. Annual Review of Sociology. 2008, 34, pp.15-31.

A.F. Firat, and A. Venkatesh,. Postmodernity: The Age of Marketing. International Journal of research in Marketing. 1993, 10(3), pp.227-249.

M. Brigg. The Developers of Self: A Non-Deterministic Foucauldian Frame. Third World Quarterly. 2009, 30(8), p.1411-1426.

R. J. House, M. Javidan. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies by Dr. Robert J. House, Dr. Paul J. Hanges, Dr. Mansour Javidan, and Peter W. Dorfman (Edts) London: Sage Publication. 2004, pp. 9-26.

H. C. Triandis. Cultur and Social Behavior, New York : McGraw-Hill, 1994.

S. Cornell, D. Hartmann. Ethnicity and Race, Making Identities in a Changing World, Pine Forge Press / A London: Sage Publication Company, 1998.

A. J. Sementelli. Antiessentialism, Parrhesia, and Citizenship. Administrative Theory & Praxis. September 2009, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 360–376.

J. T. Hansen. Inner Subjective Experiences and Social Constructionism: A Response to Rudes and Guterman (2007). Journal of Counseling & Development. 2010, Volume 88, pp. 210-213.

A. Wasti, S. E. Erdil. Bireycilik Ve Toplulukçuluk Değerlerinin Ölçülmesi: Benlik Kurgusu ve INDCOL Ölçeklerinin Türkçe Geçerlemesi, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2007, 7 (1-2), pp. 39-66.

R. Karababa. Örgütsel Tutumlar Üzerinde Kültürün ve İş Çevresinin Göreli Etkileri: Türkiye’de ve Almanya’da Çalışan Türk İşçiler Üzerinde Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2010.

H. C. Triandis. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press Inc. 1995.

T. DOĞAN. Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği’ nin (Sgkö) Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 2010, 39, p. 151-159.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v5i3.503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 reyhan karababa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


INDEXING

 

Environmental Science Journals,<br /> Natural Science Journals, SciTech Journals, Illustrata: Natural Science ICV 2015: 81.51DOAJREPEC   citefactor researcherid ECONBIZ ERIHPLUS     Sherpa" researchbib Gale Base    

Ulrichs     Stanford    

cornelniv    oclc     Toc     google
    ez3     ilinois sjif ohs 




Administred: Rocsana B. Manea Tonis

http://icourses.wix.com/itmk 

.