How Does the Changing Access to Resources Affect the Power and Authority of the Postsocialist Romanian State?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v2i1.32Keywords:
postsocialism, resources, property, power, authority and the stateAbstract
In the past two decades, former postsocialist countries such as Romania have experienced very radical changes in terms of government and resource policy (Swinnen, 1997; Swinnen et al., 1997; Szelenyi, 1998; Turnock, 1998). To make sense of these changes this review paper will make use of recent postsocialist literature, which links the access and control over resources to the exercise of power and authority in the postsocialist state (Berry, 1993; Lund, 2002; Verdery, 2002; Ribot and Peluso, 2003; Sikor, 2006; Sikor and Lund, 2009; Sikor, Stahl and Dorondel, 2009).The review paper aims to re-trace this line in postsocialist thinking in the relevant literature and show how the concepts of property and access to resources are connected to the crucial concepts of power and authority. It will perform a critical review of the relevant literature and also explore the aforementioned concepts of property, access, power, authority and state.It will furthermore show how these concepts feed into the formation and consolidation of the Romanian postsocialist state. Since conflicts over property are emphasised by postsocialist researchers (de Waal, 1996; Giordano and Kostova, 1996; Verdery, 1999; Rabinowicz and Swinnen, 1997; Swinnen and Mathjs, 1997; Szelenyi, 1998; Sikor, 2003; Sikor, Stahl and Dorondel, 2009; Dorondel and Sikor, 2009), these are underlined here and thought to be the main thread connecting property and access to resources with power and authority in the new state. More specifically, the paper will reveal how said conflicts force actors to seek the authorization of their property claims at the door of the state. By doing so, they grant the new state the authority to do so again in the future and thereby contribute to the consolidation of its legitimacy.Essentially this review paper argues that changes to resource access engender conflicts, which in turn lead to the formation of a new social contract between the postsocialist state and its people (Lund, 2002).References
Abrams, P. (1988) ‘Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State’, Journal of Historical Sociology 1(1): 58–89.
Akram-Lodhi, A. H., Borras, S. M., Jr. & Kay, C. (Eds.) (2007). Land, poverty and livelihoods in the era of globalization: Perspectives from developing and transition countries. London: Routledge.
Berry, S. (1993) No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bernstein, H. (2002). Land reform: Taking a long(er) view. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2, 433–463.
Boone, C. (2003) Political Topographies of the African State: Territorial Authority and Institutional Choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Borras, S. M. Jr., (2003). Questioning market-led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa.Journal ofAgrarian Change, 3, 367–394.
Bradbury, M., Fisher, S., Lane, C., (1995). Working with pastoralist NGOs and land conŻict in Tanzania.IIED London.
Broegaard, R. B. (2009), Land Access and Titling in Nicaragua. Development and Change, 40: 149–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01509.x
Bruce, J., Fortmann, L., Nhira, C., 1993. Tenures in transition, tenures in conflict: examples from the Zimbabwe social forest. Rural Sociology 58, 626– 642.
Bruce, J. W., & Migot-Adholla, S. E. (1994).Searching for land tenure security in Africa. Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Boucher, S. R., Barham, B. L., & Carter, M. R. (2005).The impact of ‘‘Market-Friendly” reforms on credit and land markets in Honduras and Nicaragua.World Development, 33, 107–128.
Byres, T. J. (2004). Neo-classical neo-populism 25 years on: Deja vu and deja passe. Towards a critique.Journal of Agrarian Change, 4, 17–44.
Cartwright, A.L. (2000) ‘State Law and the Recognition of Property in Rural Romania’. MPI Working Paper No 10. Halle: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.
Cleaver, F. (2002) ‘Reinventing Institutions: Bricolage and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management’, European Journal of Development Research 14(2): 11–30.
Comaroff, J.L. and J. Comaroff (eds) (1999) Civil Society and the Political Imagination in Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Corbridge, S., M. Srivastava and R. Veron (2005) Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Das, V. and D. Poole (eds) (2004) Anthropology at the Margins of the State. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
De Soto H., (2000).The Mystery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
de Waal, C. (1996). Decollectivisation and total scarcity in high Albania.Pages 169–192.inR. Abrahams Eds, After social-ism: land reform and social change in Eastern Europe. Berghahn Books, Oxford.
Deininger, K., (2003). Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, D.C.
Demsetz, H. (1967) ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review 57(2): 347–59.
Dorondel, S., Sikor, T. (2009), Private Property: From Postsocialism to Neoliberalism?, Annuaire Roumain d’Anthropologie, Vol. 46, pp. 55-62,.
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Derick Fay, Land Tenure, Land Use, and Land Reform at Dwesa–Cwebe, South Africa: Local Transformations and the Limits of the State, World Development, Volume 37, Issue 8, August 2009, Pages 1424-1433, ISSN 0305-750X, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.012.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X09000576)
Ferguson, J. and A. Gupta (2002) ‘Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality’, American Ethnologist 29(4): 981–1002.
Firmin-Sellers, K. (1996) The Transformation of Property Rights in the Gold Coast. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Firmin-Sellers, K. (2000) ‘Custom, Capitalism, and the State: The Origins of Insecure Land Tenure in West Africa’, Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics 156: 513–30.
Fogel, A., King, B. J., & Shanker, S. (Eds.), (2008). Human development in the 21st century: Visionary policy ideas from systems scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Published, 2008.
Fortmann, L. (1995) Talking Claims: Discursive Strategies in Contesting Property. World Development 23(6), pp. 1053-1063.
Fortmann, L., (1985). The tree tenure factor in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa. Agroforestry Systems 2, 229–251.
Foucault, M. (1980) ‘Truth and Power’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge, pp. 109–33. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Fox, K. (2009). Confusion, secrecy and power: direct payments and European Integration in Romania. ANN.ROUM.ANTHROPOL.46 , P.63-75.
Giordano, C. And D. Kostova (2002), “The Social production of mistrust”, in C. Hann (ed.), Post-socialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia, pp. 74-91. London: Routledge
Giordano, C., and D. Kostova. (1996). Die Reprivatisierung ohne Bauern in der bulgarischen Landwirtschaft nach der ‚Wende’. Zur Persistenz einer unheilvollen Tradition. Sudosteuropa Aktuell 25:49–63
Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J., (2002), Spatialising States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality, American Ethnologist, 29, p. 981–1002.
Hann M.C., (1993). From Production to Property: Decollectivization and the Family-Land Relationship in Contemporary Hungary. Man (N.S) 28: 299–320.
Hann, C. (2007), Reconciling anthropologies. Anthropology Today, 23: 17–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2007.00549.x
Hanna S., M. Munasinghe, (1995). Property Rights and the Environment. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Hansen, T.B. and F. Stepputat (eds) (2005) Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hivon, M. (1998) The bullied farmer: Social pressure as a survival strategy? Pp. 33-51 in S. Bridger and F. Pine eds, Surviving Post-socialism: Local Strategies and Regional Responses inEastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (London: Routledge).
Hollis, W. (1999) Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe: The Influence of the Communist Legacy in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Romania. Boulder, CO: Eastern European Monographs.
Humphrey, C. (1995) ‘The Politics of Privatization in Provincial Russia: Popular Opinions amid the Dilemmas of the Early 1990s’, Cambridge Anthropology 18(1): 40–61.
Juul, K. and C. Lund (eds) (2002) Negotiating Property in Africa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Kaneff D., (1996). Responses to “democratic” land reforms in a Bulgarian village, in Ray Abrahams (ed.), After Socialism: Land Reform and Social Change in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 85–114.
Kurtz, M.J. and A. Barnes (2002) ‘The Political Foundations of Post-Communist Regimes’, Comparative Political Studies 35(5): 524–53.
Lampland M., (2002). The advantages of being collectivized.Cooperative farm managers in the postsocialist economy. In: C.M. Hann (ed.). Postsocialism. Ideals, ideologies and practices in Eurasia. 31–56. London and New York: Routledge.
Leach, M., Mearns, R. (1991). Poverty and environment in developing countries: An overview study. Report to ESRC, Global Environmental Change Programme; and Overseas Development Administration, ESRC, Swindon.
Leach, M., R. Mearns, and I. Scoones (1999) Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-Based Natural Resource Management. World Development 27(2), pp. 225-247.
Lenormand, P. (2001). Political mutation and agricultural change in Eastern Europe.Pages 51–81.inH. Buller, and K. Hoggart. Eds, Agricultural transformation, food and environment: perspectives on European rural policy and planning, Volume 1. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Li, T.M. (2007) TheWill to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ludewigs, T., Díantona, A., BrondÌzio, E. S. and S. Hetrick (2009) "Agrarian Structure and Land-cover Change Along the Lifespan of Three Colonization Areas in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, 37(8), 1348-1359.
Lund, C. (2002) ‘Negotiating Property Institutions: On the Symbiosis of Property and Authority in Africa’, inK. Juul andC. Lund (eds) Negotiating Property in Africa, pp. 11–43. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lund, C. (2006) ‘Twilight Institutions. Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa’, Development and Change 37(4): 685–705.
Lund, C. (ed.) (2007) Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lund, C. (2008) Local Politics and the Dynamics of Property in Africa. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacPherson, C. B. (1978). Property: Mainstream and critical positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
MacPherson, C.B. (1978) ‘Introduction’, in C.B. MacPherson (ed.) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions, pp. 1–13. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mearns, R., (1995). Institutions and natural resource management: Access to and control over woodfuel in East Africa. In Binns, T. (Ed.), People and Environment in Africa. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 103±114.
Mearns, R., (1995). Environmental entitlements: Towards empowerment for sustainable development. In ENVIRONMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS Singh N. and Titi V. (Eds.), Empowerment: Towards Sustainable Development. Zed Books, London, pp. 37±53.
Mearns, R., (1996). Environmental entitlements: pastoral natural resource management in Mongolia. Cahiers des Sciences Humaines 32 (1), 105±131.
Mearns, R., (1996). Community, collective action and common grazing: the case of post-socialist Mongolia. Journal of Development Studies 32 (3), 297±339.
Mearns, R., (1996). Commons and collectives: The lack of social capital in Central Asia's land reforms.
Migdal, J. (2001) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, S.F. (1988) ‘Legitimation as a Process: The Expansion of Government and Party in Tanzania’, in R. Cohen and J.D. Toland (eds) State Formation and Political Legitimacy, pp. 155–72. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Mungiu-Pippidi A., Althabe G., (2002). Secera şi buldozerul.Scornicesti şi Nucşoara.Mecanisme de aservire a ţăranului român [The Sickle and the Bulldozer.Scornicesti and Nucsoara.Mechanisms of Romanian Peasant Subjugation]. Iaşi: Polirom
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2005) ‘Reinventing the Peasants: Local State Capture in Post-Communist Europe’, in S. Dorondel and S. Serban (eds) Between East and West: Studies in Anthropology and Social History, pp. 308–26. Bucharest: Editura Institutului Cultural Romˆan.
Nuijten,M. (2003) Power, Community and the State: The Political Anthropology of Organisation in Mexico. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
Otsuka, K., & Place, F. (2001).Land tenure and natural resource management: A comparative study of agrarian communities in Asia and Africa. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Pacheco, P. (2009) "Agrarian Reform in the Brazilian Amazon: Its Implications for Land
Distribution and Deforestation," World Development, 37(8), 1337-1347.
Patterson, C., (2009), The Paradox of market reform: Pământ and the vicious circle in the Republic of Moldova, ANN.ROUM.ANTHROPOL.46, p.77-91, Bucharest
Peters, P. E. (2009) "Challenges in Land Tenure and Land Reform in Africa: Anthropological Contributions," World Development, 37(8), 1317-1325.
Peluso, N. (1992) Coercing Conservation: The Politics of State Resource Control. Global Environmental Change 3(2), pp. 199-217.
Peluso, N.L., (1992). Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley, C.A.
Peluso, N.L., (1996). Fruit Trees and Family Trees in an Anthropogenic Forest: Ethics of Access, Property Zones, and Environmental Change in Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 28, pp. 510-548.
Place, F. (2009) "Land Tenure and Agricultural Productivity in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of the Economics Literature and Recent Policy Strategies and Reforms," World Development, 37(8), 1326-1336.
Platteau, J.-P. (1996) ‘The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment’, Development and Change 27(1): 29–86.
Pop-Eleches, G. (2001) ‘Romania’s Politics of Dejection’, Journal of Democracy 12(3): 156–69.
Rabinowicz, E., and J. F. M. Swinnen. (1997). Political economy of privatization and decollectivization of Central and East European agriculture: definitions, issues and methodology. Pages 1–31.inJ. F. M. Swinnen Eds, Political economy of agrarian reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot.
Ribot, J. (1998) Theorizing Access: Forest Profits along Senegal's Charcoal Commodity Chain. Development and Change 29, pp. 307-341.
Ribot, J.C., & Peluso, N. (2003).A theory of access.Rural Sociology, 68(2), pp. 153-181.
Rocheleau, D. and L. Ross (1995) ‘Trees as Tools, Trees as Text: Struggles over Resources in Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic’, Antipode 27(4): 407–28.
Rocheleau, D., and D. Edmunds (1997) Women, Men and Trees: Gender, Power and Property in Forest and Agrarian Landscapes. World Development 25(8): 1351-1371.
Shipton, P., & Goheen, M. (1992). Understanding African land-holding: Power, wealth, and meaning. Africa, 62, 307–325.
Schwartz A.H., (2006). The Politics of Greed: How Privatization Structured Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, INC.
Schwartz, K.Z.S. (2006) "Masters in Our Native Place": The politics of Latvian national parks on the road from Communism to Europe. Political Geography 25, pp. 42-71.
Schwegler A.T., (2008). Take it from the top (down)? Rethinking neoliberalism and political hierarchy in Mexico.American Ethnologist 35(4): 682–700.
Scott J., (1998). Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Scott, J.C., (2005), Afterword to Moral Economies, State Spaces, and Categorical Violence, American Anthropologist, 107 (3), p. 396–402.
Sikor, T. (2003).Thoughts on the Role of the State in Resource Governance, in: The Common Property Resource Digest, No. 64, p. 9,
Sikor, T. (2004),The Commons in Transition: Agrarian and Environmental Change in Central and Eastern Europe, in: Environmental Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 270-280.
Sikor, T., (2005), Property and Agri-Environmental Legislation in Central and Eastern Europe, Sociologia Ruralis, 45 (3), p. 187–201.
Sikor, T. (2006), Analyzing Community-based Forestry: Local, Political and Agrarian Perspectives, in: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 339-349,.
Sikor, T. Lund C. , (2009), Access and Property: A Question of Power and Authority, Development and Change, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1-22,.
Sikor, T. and D. Muller (2009) "The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction,"
World Development, 37(8), 1307-1316.
Sikor, T., Stahl, J., Dorondel, S. (2009), Negotiating Post-Socialist Property and State: Struggles over Forests in Albania and Romania, Development and Change, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 171-193,.
Sikor, T., M¸ller, D. and J. Stahl, (2009) "Land Fragmentation and Cropland Abandonment in Albania: Implications for the Roles of State and Community in Post-Socialist Land Consolidation," World Development, Volume 37(8), 1411-1423.
Sikor, T., Sturgeon, J., 2004. Postsocialist property relations in Asia and Europe: variations on fuzziness. Conservation and Society 2, 1 –17.
Staddon, C. (2000) ‘Restitution of Forest Property in Post-Communist Bulgaria’, Natural Resources Forum 24: 237–46.
Staddon, C. (2001) ‘Restructuring the Bulgarian Wood-Processing Sector: Linkages Between Resource Exploitation, Capital Accumulation, and Redevelopment in a Postcommunist Locality’, Environment and Planning A 33: 607–28.
Stark, D. and L. Bruszt (1998) Post-Socialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sturgeon, J., Sikor, T. (2004), Postsocialist Property in Asia and Europe - Variations on 'Fuzziness', in: Conservation and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-17,.
Swinnen, J. F. M. (1997). The choice of privatization and decollectivization policies in Central and Eastern European agriculture: Observations and political economy hypotheses. Pages 363–398.inJ. F. M. Swinnen Eds, Political economy of agrarian reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Swinnen, J. F. M., A. Buckwell, and E. Mathijs.(1997). Agricultural privatization, land reform and farm restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe.Ashgate, Aldershot, UK 396.
Swinnen, J. F. M., and E. Mathijs. (1997). Agricultural privatization, land reform and farm restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparative analysis. Pages 333–365.In J. F. M.
Szelenyi, I. (1998). Introduction: a theoretical framework. Pages 1–17.inI. Szelenyi Eds, Privatizing the land: rural political economy in post-communist societies. Routledge, London.
Tangermann, S., and M. Banse.(2000). Central and Eastern European agriculture in an expanding European Union.CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, Connecticut 216.
Tismaneanu, V. and G. Kligman (2001) ‘Romania’s First Postcommunist Decade: From Iliescu to Iliescu’, East European Constitutional Review 10(1) (Internet publication.
http://www1.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol10num1/features/romaniafirstpostcomdecade.html
Turnock, D. (1998). Conclusion.Pages 356–400.inD. Turnock Eds, Privatization in rural Eastern Europe: the process of restitution and restructuring. Studies of Communism in Transition.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Upton, C. (2009) "Custom and Contestation: Land Reform in Post-Socialist Mongolia," World Development, 37(8), 1400-1410.
Vandergeest, P., Peluso, N.L., (1995). Territorialization and State Power in Thailand.Theory and Society 24, pp. 385-426.
Verdery K., (1999). Fuzzy property: Rights, Power, and Identity in Transylvania's decollectivization. In: M. Burawoy and K. Verdery (Eds.). Uncertain Transition.Ethnographies of Change in thePostsocialist World.53–81. Lanham Boulder New York Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Verdery K., (2002). Whither postsocialism? In: C.M. Hann (ed.). Postsocialism. Ideals, ideologies and practices in Eurasia. Pp. 15–22. London and New York: Routledge.
Verdery K., (2003). The Vanishing Hectare.Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Verdery, K. (1996) What Was Socialism? And What Comes Next? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Verdery, K. (2004) ‘The Obligations of Ownership: Restoring Rights to Land in Postsocialist Transylvania’, in K. Verdery and C. Humphrey (eds) Property in Question. Value Transformation in the Global Economy, pp. 139–59. Oxford and New York: Berg.
Verdery, K. (2004). ‘The Property Regime of Socialism’, Conservation and Society 2(1): 189–98.
von Benda-Beckmann, K. (1981) ‘Forum Shopping and Shopping Forums: Dispute Processing in a Minangkabau Village in West Sumatra’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 117–59.
Weber, M. (1976) [1922] Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der Verstehenden Soziologie (Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology). T¨ubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Wegren, S. K. (1998). Land reform in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People by Authors is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ojs.spiruharet.ro/index.php/jedep/issue/archive.
