INTERDEPENDENCE of DIGITAL PLATFORMS, DEVELOPMENT of TECHNOFEUDALISM and WORK PRECARIOUSNESS in the GIG ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v13i4.867Keywords:
Gig economy, digital platforms, work precariousness, technofeudalismAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present the results of an analysis that explores the interdependence between digital platforms and development of technofeudalism and work precariousness within the Gig economy, examining how digital platforms influence the establishment of technofeudal power structures. Digital platforms have transformed traditional employment by promoting freelance work and facilitating the transition to flexible, short-term work arrangements. This model introduces significant challenges, in particular, insecurity, “algorithmic control” and a lack of worker protections. Platforms often control access to work, dictate wage structures, and retain ownership of workers’ data. By analysing case studies such as Glovo and Uber, this paper illustrates how these platforms create a system that encourages “self-exploitation” under the guise of autonomy and entrepreneurial freedom. This dynamic contributes to technofeudalism, concentrating power among platform owners who profit significantly, while workers become vulnerable and dependent on these digital systems for income. As a result, they face unstable wages, reduced autonomy, and isolation due to algorithmic management. This research advances our understanding of digital labour practices and provides a theoretical framework for interpreting power and inequality in the gig economy. It highlights the need for regulatory changes to ensure fair treatment of short-term and freelance workers.References
Miloševic, D., Ilic, D. & Popovic, J. (2021). Trends Analysis in GIG Economy, Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Vol10.No.3.(2021). Editura Fundatiei Romania de Maine, member institutions of the Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities (ACEU), pp.50-59.
Zwick, A. (2018). Welcome to the Gig Economy: Neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber. GeoJournal, 83, 679–691.
Arcidiacono, D., Borghi, P., & Ciarini, A. (2019). Platform work: From digital promises to labour challenges. Partecipazione e conflitto, 12, 611–628.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital platforms, gig economy, precarious employment, and the invisible hand of social class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597–600.
Standing, G. (2018). The precariat: Today’s transformative class? Development, 61(1–4), 115a–a121. Strauss, K., 2017. Precarious work. International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology, pp.1-9.
Standing G. (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Bloomsbury, New York
Frade, C., Darmon, I., & Laparra, M. (2004). Precarious employment in Europe: A comparative study of labour market related risks in flexible economies. ESOPE project funded by the European Commission within the V Framework Programme. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242731766_Precarious_ employment_in_Europe_a_comparative_study_of_labour_market_related_risk_in_ flexible_economies
Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. Russell Sage Foundation.
Kalleberg, A. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2018). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics. In Precarious work: Causes, characteristics, and consequences (pp. 1–30). Emerald
Mai, Q. D. (2018). Precarious work in Europe: Assessing cross-national differences and institutional determinants of precarity in 32 European countries. In Precarious work: Causes, characteristics, and consequences (pp. 273–306). Emerald.
Agrawal, D., & Bhukya, R. (2022). Effects of the GIG economy on the workplace: A contemporary Indian perspective study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 2701–2718. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6176, R.
Bérastégui, P. (2021). Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the gig economy: a systematic review. Etui. Report 2021.
Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03
Behl, A., Rajagopal, K., Sheorey, P., & Mahendra, A. (2022). Barriers to Entry of Gig Workers in the Gig Platforms: Exploring the Dark Side of the Gig Economy. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74, 818-839. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-08-2021-0235
Bajwa U., Gastaldo D., Di Ruggiero E. and Knorr L. (2018a) The health of workers in the global gig economy, Globalization and Health, 14 (1), 1-4.
Cabrelli D. and Graveling R. (2019) Health and safety in the workplace of the future, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union
Goods C., Veen A. and Barratt T. (2019) ‘Is your gig any good?’ Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector, Journal of Industrial Relations, 61 (4), 502-527.
Lehdonvirta V., Kässi O., Hjorth I., Barnard H. and Graham M. (2019) The global platform economy: a new offshoring institution enabling emerging-economy microproviders, Journal of Management, 45 (2), 567-599.
Bourdieu, P. (1998) ‘La précarité est aujourd’hui partout’, in Contre-feux, Paris: Liber-Raison d’agir, pp 95–101.
Carmo, R. M., Cantante, F. and Alves, N.A. (2014) ‘Time projections: youth and precarious employment’, Time & Society, 23(3): 337–57.
Duggan J., Sherman U., Carbery R. and McDonnell A. (2019) Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM, Human Resource Management Journal, 30 (1), 114-132.
Ritschel C. (2019) Uber launches ‘quiet mode’ for users who want to ride in silence, The Independent, 16 May 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/uber-quietmode-how-silence-cost-price-users-preferences-black-a891695
Jamie K. and Musilek K. (2020) Gig economy, in Ritzer G. (ed.) The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1463
Joynes V.C.T. (2017) Defining and understanding the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional responsibility: implications for educating health and social care students, Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 23 (1), 133-149.
Ophir Y., Sisso I., Asterhan C.S.C., Tikochinski R. and Reichart R. (2019) The Turker blues: hidden factors behind increased depression rates among Amazon’s Mechanical Turkers, Clinical Psychological Science, 8 (1), 65-83
Twenge J.M., Joiner T.E., Rogers M.L. and Martin G.N. (2018) Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time, Clinical Psychological Science, 6 (1), 3-17.
Vives A., Amable M., Ferrer M., Moncada S., Llorens C. and Muntaner C. (2013) Employment precariousness and poor mental health: evidence from Spain on a new social determinant of health, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2013 (1), 1-10.
Barratt, T., Goods, C. & Veen, A. (2020) 'I'm my own boss…': active intermediation and 'entrepreneurial' worker agency in the Australian gig‐economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1643–1661. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20914346
Galière, S. (2020) When food‐delivery platform workers consent to algorithmic management: a Foucauldian perspective. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35, 357–370.
Gregory, K. & Sadowski, J. (2021) Biopolitical platforms: the perverse virtues of digital labour. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14, 662–674
Morini, C., Carls, K. & Armano, E. (2014) Precarious passion or passionate precariousness? Narratives from co‐research in journalism and editing. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 45(2), 61–83.
Duball, V. (2023). On algorithmic wage discrimination. Available from SSRN 4331080
Vieira, D. (2021). Platform couriers' self‐exploitation: The case study of Glovo. New Technol Work Employ. 2023;1–20. Brian Towers (BRITOW) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.1227
Wood, A., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). Platforms disrupting reputation: Precarity and recognition struggles in the remote gig economy. Sociology, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803852211268
Rahman H (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Administrative and Science Quarterly 66(4): 945–988.
Bucher EL, Schou PK and Waldkirch M (2021) Pacifying the algorithm–Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization 28(1): 44–67.
Gregory K (2020) ‘My life is more valuable than this’: Understanding risk among on-demand food couriers in Edinburgh. Work, Employment and Society 35(2): 316–331.
Sutherland W, Jarrahi MH, Dunn M, et al. (2020) Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment and Society 34(3): 457–475.
Webster, C., & Ivanov, S. (2020). Robotics, artificial intelligence, and the evolving nature of work. In Digital Transformation in Business and Society (pp. 127-143). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Ravenelle, A. J. (2019). Hustle and gig: Struggling and surviving in the sharing economy. University of California Press
Schor, J. B., Attwood‐Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49, 833–861.
Shibata, S. (2020). Gig‐work and the discourse of autonomy: Fictitious freedom in Japan’s digital economy. New Political Economy, 25(4), 535–551.
Jonah Henkle (2024). Technofeudalism or Technosocialism? WeChat as Socialist Alternative to Platform Capitalism. Stachka. 1, 63–74. Center for Experimental Humanities, New York University, New York
Ribbans, D. Nkohla-Ramunenyiwa, T. Jean-Paul, van Belle, J., Tsibolane, P. (2023) Driven to the brink: Understanding digital labour platform precarity among UberGo e-hailing drivers. ICTD2022, June 27–29, 2022, Seattle, WA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572334.357237
Selabe William Kute (2017). The Sharing Economy in the Global South: Uber’s Precarious Labour Force in Johannesburg. Faculty of Humanities. University of the Witwatersrand.
Stenovec, T. January 7, 2016. ‘More Proof That Uber is Killing the Taxi Industry’ Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/more-proof-that-uber-is-killing-the-taxiindustry-2016-1
Uber. 2016. ‘Reasons to Drive’. Uber Newsroom. https://www.uber.com/en-ZA/drive/
Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., Ukkonen, A. 2014. ‘The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption’ Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology. Vol. 69, No. 9. pp 2047-2059
Varoufakis Y (2024) Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Brooklyn: Melville House.
Glovo (2024), https://about.glovoapp.com/ (26.11.2024).
Uber (2024), https://www.uber.com/ (26.11.2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nevena Krasulja, Dejan Ilić, Dragana Radosavljević, Aleksandar Mihajlović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People by Authors is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ojs.spiruharet.ro/index.php/jedep/issue/archive.
