Characteristic of in-work poverty – a comparison between Romania and European Union

Authors

  • Mihaela Ghența National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v6i3.546

Keywords:

labour market, in-work poverty

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the characteristics of the working poor in Romania compared to other European Member States. In-work poverty is an important aspect in the discussions regarding the effectiveness of employment in preventing the risk of poverty. The in-work poverty is the result of several factors among which we mention those related to the individual characteristics, household composition, and labour market policies. In Romania, the level of in-work poverty continues to remain high for the overall employed population aged 18 years and over and this evolution is due to the part-time working program, the temporary contracts, and the low level of education. The last part of the article presents the measures identified in the scientific literature to reduce the in-work poverty. 

Author Biography

Mihaela Ghența, National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection

National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection

References

L. Bardone, and A.C. Guio, In-work poverty — New commonly agreed indicators at the EU level, 2005. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/statistics5-2005_en.pdf.

S. Danziger, and R.H. Haveman. Understanding Poverty. Russel Sage Foundation, 2001.

M. Stanciu. Consideraţiiasupracercetărilorprivindsărăciaextremă.Calitateavieţii.2004, XV, 3–4: 317–332.

K. Van den Bosch, and I. Marx,How poverty differs from inequality. On poverty measurement in an enlarged EU context: conventional and alternative approaches, 2007. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f906/47452b1683f044ed094e67d68142595a3330.pdf?_ga=2.84348890.214898829.1506510777-576008456.1506510777.

J. Iceland. Poverty in America: A Handbook. University of California Press, 2006.

Eurostat, EU labour force survey – methodology, 2014. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/EU_labour_force_survey_-_methodology.

European Commission, Portfolio of indicators for the monitoring of the European strategy for social protection and social exclusion — 2009 update, 2009. Available athttp://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=756&langId=en.

Social Protection Committee, SPPM THEMATIC REVIEWS ON THE 2012 SOCIAL TRENDS TO WATCH. The working poor in Europe, 2012.

Social Protection Committee, Social Europe – Many ways, one objective - Report of the Social Protection Committee, 2014. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=7695&type=2&furtherPubs=yes.

InstitutulNaţional de Statistică, AMIGO Ancheta foţei de muncăîngospodării, 2014. Available at http://colectaredate.insse.ro/metadata/viewStatisticalResearch.htm?locale=ro&researchId=2114.

L. Mladen, and R. Bucea-Manea-Tonis.Premises for Adapting Curriculum and Educational Package to Labor Market Requirements. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. 2016, 5(2), 38-45.

H. Frazer, and E. Marlier, In-work Poverty and Labour Market Segmentation in the EU: Key Lessons, 2010. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1025&langId=en&newsId=1394&moreDocuments=yes&tableName=news.

K. Ray, P. Sissons, K. Jones, S. Vegeris, Employment, Pay and Poverty: Evidence and policy review, 2014. Available at http://www.nechildpoverty.org.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/Employment%20pay%20and%20poverty%20.pdf.

Eurostat, 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.

OECD, Is work the best antidote to poverty?, 2009. Available at https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/45219514.pdf.

V. Ciucă, and L. Mladen, Assessing Flexicurity Policy - Case Study for Romania, 2009. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1483061.

J. Heyes, and P. Lewis. Employment Protection under Fire: Labour Market Deregulation and Employment in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2014, 35(4), 587–607.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles