Impact of weight indicators of TOPSIS technique  in the selected district in the Slovak republic

Roman Vavrek; Peter Adamišin

doi:10.26458/jedep.v2i4.48

Autori

Roman Vavrek
Peter Adamišin University of Prešov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v2i4.48

Cuvinte cheie:

TOPSIS technique, municipality, Prešov district

Rezumat

The purpose of multicriteria decision models is to help decision maker to evaluate each alternative and to rank them in descending order of performance. This study analyses the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for using in local government area. The aim of this paper is to analyse the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for selecting the most efficient municipality in selected district in the Slovak Republic. Achieving this purpose, TOPSIS technique (in two variants) is used as decision making tools.

Referințe

. BONDOR, C. I., MURESAN, A. 2012. Correlated Criteria in Decision Models: Recurrent Application of TOPSIS Method. In Applied Medical Informatics [online]. 2012. [cit. 2013.10.12]. Available on the internet:

<http://search.proquest.com/docview/934310759?accountid=14716>.

. FABUŠ, M. 2011. Využitie matematicko-štatistických metód v ŠVOC. In K rozvoju študentskej vedeckej odbornej činnosti na Ústave ekonomie a manažmentu na VŠEMvs. Bratislava : Vysoká škola ekonomie a manažmentu verejnej správy v Bratislave, 2011. ISBN 9-788097-049591, pp. 9-14.

. JABLONSKÝ, J. 2002. Operační výzkum: Kvantitativní modely pro ekonomické rozhodování. 2. vyd. Praha : Professional Publishing, 2002. 323 pp. ISBN 80-86419-23-1.

. LING-FENG, H., JIUNG-BIN, CH., MU-CHEN, W., 2006. Performence evaluation for university electronic libraries in Taiwan. In The Electronic Library. [online]. 2010. [cit. 2013.10.13]. Available on the internet:

<http://search.proquest.com/docview/218233243?accountid=14716>.

. LIŠTIAK, P. 2012. Konkurencieschopnosť slovenského hospodárstva vo vzťahu k energetike v období finančnej krízy. In . Management Challenges in the 21st Century [online]. 2012. [cit. 2013.10.12]. Available on the internet:

<http://www.cutn.sk/Library/proceedings/mch_2012/editovane_prispevky/Li%C5%A1tiak.pdf>.

. MINAŘÍK, P. 2010. Porovnání investičních instrumentů – vicekriteriální rozhodování. In Matematika v ekonomické praxi. Jihlava : VŠP Jihlava, 2010. ISBN 978-80-87035-34-4, pp. 121-132.

. NOORAMIN, A.S. ET AL. 2012. TOPSIS and AHP techniques for selecting the most efficient marine container yard gantry crane. In Operational Research Society of India [online]. 2012. [cit. 2013.10.12]. Available on the internet:

<http://www.pulib.sk:2088/pqcentral/docview/1017942897/141115FE11FDBD1D61/1?accountid=14716>.

. PANCÁKOVÁ, V. 2009. Štatistické metódy pre ekonómov. Bratislava : Ekonóm, 2009. 411 pp. ISBN 978-80-8078-284-9.

. REKTOŘÍK, J. A KOL. 2007. Ekonomika a řízení odvětví veřejného sektoru. Praha : Ekopress, 2007. 309 s. ISBN 978-80-86929-29-3.

. RIMARČÍK, M. 2007. Štatistika pre prax. 1. vyd. 2007. 200 pp. ISBN 978-80-969813-1-1

. ŠEBO, J. – ŠEBOVÁ, M. 2010. Meranie konkurencieschopnosti viackritériálnym hodnotením. In Journal of Competitiveness 1/2010 [online]. 2010. [cit. 2013.10.12]. Available on the internet: <http://www.cjournal.cz/index.php?hid=clanek&bid=archiv&cid=23&cp=>.

. YILMAZ, B., HARMANCIOGLU, N.B. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making for water ressource management: A case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. In Water S.A. [online]. 2010. [cit. 2013.10.13]. Available on the internet:

<http://search.proquest.com/docview/814875563?accountid=14716>.